Chris Dodd for President

Senator Dodd has an op-ed out today on the differences between the Democratic presidential candidates on ending the war in Iraq and getting all US troops out before 2013. The op-ed is appearing in both The Huffington Post and Manchester Union-Leader.

Read the full text of Senator Dodd's op-ed below the fold.

This clip is from Wednesday night's MSNBC debate at Dartmouth College.

Update:
Joh Padgett at Blue Indiana writes on the 2013 question:

Anyone who is considering voting for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama and that considers themselves to be antiwar is delusional if they think their candidate will get us out of Iraq before this decade is out. Chris Dodd clearly and unequivocally stated on the record as you see in that video that he will not have troops stationed in Iraq at the beginning of a second term.

Enough is enough people, if you are backing Hillary or Obama and getting out of Iraq is your main priority then its time you quit measuring this race, hike up your big boy/big girl pants, be an adult and choose to back a candidate that will get us out of Iraq for real.

Amen, Joh!

Last night's debate brought the issue of residual forces in Iraq to the front and center Democratic presidential campaign. The candidates presented their differing views on whether or not they would have all us troops out of Iraq by the end of their first term in office -- 2013 -- six years from now.

Sadly, there was little difference between the "top tier" candidates, as Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards all said they will not have ended our involvement in Iraq by 2013.

Six years from now.

Blogger Jeffrey Feldman writes:

The top-tier candidates all agreed last night that the Iraq war is only half over--that if elected President, each will continue the U.S. occupation and U.S. combat operations inside Iraq until at 2013. This means that the official Democratic position is now that the Iraq war will be a ten-year war.

Now, I strongly disagree with Feldman that waiting until 2013 is the "official Democratic position." It is only the consensus position held by the three front-running candidates.

It is not Chris Dodd's official position. Nor is it the position of millions of Democrats and anti-war activists who are fighting to end the war today.

Dodd made his stance crystal clear in this exchange with moderator Tim Russert:

Tim Russert: I want to put you on the record. Will you pledge as Commander in Chief that you have all troops out of Iraq by January of 2013?

Chris Dodd: I will get that done.

Tim Russert: You'll get it done?

Chris Dodd: Yes, I will, sir.

That's where Dodd is. And yet, the consensus among the Clinton-Obama-Edwards trio, the three largest recipients of time in last night's Democratic debate, was that they would not end the war in Iraq by 2013.

Last night's debate made it abundantly clear that while there exists a consensus among the "top tier" of Democratic presidential that they won't be committed to end the war by 2013, there is an alternative: Chris Dodd. Dodd is the only candidate who's fighting to pass legislation to cut off funding for the war now while committing to get our troops out of Iraq in his first term in office if he can't succeed legislatively before then.

If you want to end the war in Iraq and if you have been a supporter of Barack Obama, John Edwards, or Hillary Clinton, I'd like to take this opportunity to invite you to join the Dodd Squad. You'll have a candidate who stands with you in your desire about ending the war and you will never, ever have to apologize for him pledging to keep US troops in Iraq for six more years.

Here's a statement from Senator Dodd that went to press only moments ago.


"Despite the exemplary performance of our troops, we are coming off the bloodiest summer of this misguided war and it should be clear that there can be no military solution in Iraq.

"It is useless to argue the merits of a specific tactic when the strategy itself is failed.

"In fact, debating over military tactics when there is no military solution only undermines efforts by those of us who believe that we must change course in Iraq now and begin to immediately redeploy US combat forces so that Iraqi leaders will have the impetus to find a political accord."

Please take a moment and sign-up (on the right side of the screen) to receive updates like this, as they happen, directly from the campaign. -- Tim